Analisis Komparatif Kinerja Emas dan Bitcoin sebagai Alternatif Instrumen Investasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/nuansa.v3i2.1818Keywords:
Bitcoin, Gold, InvestmentsAbstract
Global economic uncertainty has raised concerns among the public, triggering actions to secure economic stability by investing, especially in gold and bitcoin. This study uses a comparative quantitative method, with the aim of comparing the returns, risks, and performance of the two investment instruments. The population in this study is in the form of data on the monthly closing prices of gold and bitcoin for the period of January 2019 – April 2025 which totals 152 data, consisting of 76 data from each variable. Data analysis was carried out by calculating returns, risks, Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen indices. The three indices are widely used performance measurement methods and have included return and risk factors in their measurements. The results of this study show that there is a significant difference between the return of gold and bitcoin, while for the risk variable between the two, there is no significant difference. Performance based on the Sharpe method also showed no significant difference between the two. However, for performance measurement using the Treynor and Jensen methods, significant differences were obtained between the two instruments. Overall, bitcoin offers higher profit potential than gold, even more so for investors who can accept high volatility. However, the decision to choose an investment instrument still depends on the risk profile of each investor.
Downloads
References
Adnyana, I. M. (2020). Manajemen Investasi dan Portofolio. Jakarta Selatan: LPU-UNAS.
Antonopoulos, A. M. (2017). Mastering Bitcoin Programming The Open Blockchain. Sebastopol: O'Reilly.
Firdhy, E. H., & Amanah, L. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Cryptocurrency Bitcoin, Saham dan Emas Sebagai Alternatif Investasi. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi.
Hamdhi, A. (2025, Maret 11). Bappebti Catat Transaksi Emas Digital di Indonesia Melonjak 195% YoY di Januari 2025. Diambil kembali dari Kontan.co.id: https://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/bappebti-catat-transaksi-emas-digital-di-indonesia-melonjak-195-yoy-di-januari-2025
Hamidah, H. (2025, April 13). Dosen Unand: 6 Instrumen Terbaik di Tengah Ketidakpastian Ekonomi Global. Diambil kembali dari Tempo.co: https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/dosen-unand-6-instrumen-terbaik-di-tengah-ketidakpastian-ekonomi-global-1230653
Lantiva, M. C. (2025, April 24). Ini Ternyata Alasan Harga Emas Antam Meroket Tiap Harinya! Salah Satunya Kekhawatiran Ramalan Ekonomi Global 2030. Diambil kembali dari Jawa Pos Radar Jogja: https://radarjogja.jawapos.com/ekonomi/655920974/ini-ternyata-alasan-harga-emas-antam-meroket-tiap-harinya-salah-satunya-kekhawatiran-ramalan-ekonomi-global-2030
Lumbantobing, C., & Saddalia, I. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Cryptocurrency Bitcoin, Saham, dan Emas sebagai Alternatif Investasi Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Cryptocurrency. Studi Ilmu Manajemen dan Organisasi (SIMO), 33-45.
Mumpuni, M., & Sitohang, S. E. (2017). Panduan Berinvestasi Emas untuk Pemula. Bandung: Finansialku.com.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
Wiratno, A. (2025, April 11). Breaking News Nilai Transaksi Kripto Indonesia di Februari 2025 Turun Jadi Rp32,78 Triliun. Diambil kembali dari BE (IN) CRYPTO: https://id.beincrypto.com/transaksi-kripto-indonesia-februari-turun-jadi-rp3278-triliun/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Nuansa : Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen dan Ekonomi Syariah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.