Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Biro Perekonomian Kantor Gubernur Provinsi Sumatera Barat

Authors

  • Muhammad Zikri Dwitama Rofa Universitas UPI "YPTK" Padang
  • Ramdani Bayu Putra Universitas UPI "YPTK" Padang
  • Dodi Suryadi Universitas UPI "YPTK" Padang
  • Hasmaynelis Fitri Universitas UPI "YPTK" Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/maeswara.v1i2.815

Keywords:

leadership style, work discipline, motivation, employee performance, intervening variables, Economic Bureau, West Sumatra

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the relationship between leadership style, level of work discipline, motivation and employee performance at the Economic Bureau of the Governor's Office of West Sumatra Province, with motivation as an intervening variable. The research method used is a qualitative approach to gain a deeper understanding of organizational dynamics. Data was collected through interviews and observations of employees and leaders at the Economic Bureau. The research results show that effective leadership styles, such as transformative and participative leadership, have a positive influence on employee motivation and performance. On the other hand, a high level of work discipline also has a positive impact on employee motivation and performance through creating a structured and supportive work environment. Employee motivation, as a mediator, plays an important role in linking leadership style, work discipline, and employee performance. This research provides valuable insight into the factors that influence employee performance in the Economic Bureau and their effectiveness on the effectiveness of economic management at the provincial level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Sales Unit Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 351–363.

Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.

Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.

Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94.

Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. Academic Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-11

How to Cite

Muhammad Zikri Dwitama Rofa, Ramdani Bayu Putra, Dodi Suryadi, & Hasmaynelis Fitri. (2024). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Biro Perekonomian Kantor Gubernur Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Maeswara : Jurnal Riset Ilmu Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(2), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.61132/maeswara.v1i2.815

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.