Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi: Tantangan Dan Langkah-Langkah Konkret

Muchamad Catur Rizky; Didit Darmawan; Suwito Suwito; Rio Saputra; Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan

doi:10.61132/manuhara.v1i4.726

Authors

Muchamad Catur Rizky Universitas Sunan Giri
Didit Darmawan Universitas Sunan Giri
Suwito Suwito Universitas Sunan Giri
Rio Saputra Universitas Sunan Giri
Novritsar Hasitongan Pakpahan Universitas Sunan Giri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/manuhara.v1i4.726

Keywords:

corruption, governance, transparency, anti-corruption legislation, anti-corruption institutions, challenges, evaluation, public participation

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia is a chronic problem that damages the social and economic structure of the country. This paper explores the history of corruption from feudal times to the modern era, highlighting corrupt practices as part of the culture of government. The government has taken serious steps by establishing anti-corruption regulations and institutions to eradicate corruption that harms society and the state. This research uses the literature study method with a focus on improving governance and increasing transparency as an effort to prevent corruption. Through qualitative analysis, this research evaluates the effectiveness of existing anti-corruption regulations and institutions, as well as understanding the impact of corruption on people's social and economic rights. The results show that the government has taken concrete steps, such as establishing the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and encouraging the use of information technology. However, the fight against corruption is faced with structural, cultural, instrumental and management barriers. Measures to improve governance and increase transparency are key to preventing corruption. Challenges include organized corruption, corrupt practices in the private sector, and non-compliance with regulations. Lack of resources is a constraint, and corruption in complex bureaucratic systems complicates case handling. Improving coordination, transparency, and public participation is needed to overcome these challenges. The government needs to continuously monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of corruption-fighting measures. Regular evaluation, public participation, and human resource capacity building are key to creating a strong and resilient system against corrupt practices. Collective awareness and cooperation between the government, anti-corruption organizations, and society are essential to build an Indonesia that is clean from corruption and just for all its people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almond, M. A. & S. D. Syfert. (1996). Beyond Compliance: Corruption, Corporate Responsibility and Ethical Standards in the New Global Economy. NCJ Int'l L. & Com. Reg., 22, 389.

Bowen, P., A. Akintoye, R. Pearl, & P. J. Edwards. (2007). Ethical Behaviour in the South African Construction Industry. Construction Management and Economics, 25(6), 631-648.

Cardoni, A., E. Kiseleva, & R. Lombardi. (2020). A Sustainable Governance Model to Prevent Corporate Corruption: Integrating Anticorruption Practices, Corporate Strategy and Business Processes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1173-1185.

Davis, K. E. (2012). The Prospects for Anti-corruption Law: Optimists versus Skeptics. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 4(2), 319-336.

De Graaf, G. (2007). Causes Of Corruption: Towards a Contextual Theory of Corruption. Public Administration Quarterly, 39-86.

De Mingo, A. C. & A. Cerrillo-i-Martínez. (2018). Improving Records Management to Promote Transparency and Prevent Corruption. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 256-261.

Dintwe, S. & D. Masiloane. (2014). Developing an Anti-Corruption Strategy for the South African Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration, 49(1), 180-198.

Iswardhana, M. R. (2023). Meninjau Kembali Kasus Suap Jaksa Pinangki Berdasarkan Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan dan Keadilan Sosial. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1), 1080-1090.

Jaakson, K., L. Johannsen, K. H. Pedersen, M. Vadi, G. Ashyrov, A. Reino, & M. L. Sööt. (2019). The Role of Costs, Benefits, and Moral Judgments in Private-to-Private Corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 71, 83-106.

Lindstedt, C. & D. Naurin. (2010). Transparency is Not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 301-322.

Nurten, K. D. (2019). The Fight Against Corruption, Current Situation and Challenges in the Republic of North Macedonia. Justicia–International Journal of Legal Sciences, 7(11), 142-150.

Omelchuk, O. M., I. Y. Haiur, O. G. Kozytska, A. V. Prysiazhna, & N. V. Khmelevska. (2022). Analysis of the Activities of Law Enforcement Authorities in the Field of Combating Crime and Corruption Offences. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(3), 700-716.

Osifo, O. C. (2014). An Ethical Governance Perspective on Anti-Corruption Policies and Procedures: Agencies and Trust in Cameroon, Ghana, and Nigeria Evaluation. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(5), 308-327.

Pozsgai-Alvarez, J. (2018). The Political Cycle of Fighting Corruption: Peru’s Experience with its First National Anti-Corruption Commission. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 7(1), 1-19.

Saputra, E. F. & H. Firmansyah. (2023). Politik Hukum dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi melalui Pembaharuan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Extraordinary Crime dalam KUHP Nasional. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4493-4504.

Siame, F. M. (2002). Contributions and Challenges in the Fight Against Corruption--An Auditor General's Perspective. International Journal of Government Auditing, 29(4), 7.