Pengaruh Hubungan Interpersonal Guru-Siswa Dan Lingkungan Sekolah Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Di SMK Negeri 1 Banyudono

Rhosi Rahmawati; Anton Subarno; Subroto Rapih

doi:10.61132/rimba.v2i1.566

Authors

Rhosi Rahmawati Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
Anton Subarno Universitas Sebelas Maret
Subroto Rapih Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/rimba.v2i1.566

Keywords:

Teacher-Student Interpersonal Relationship, School Environment, Quantitative

Abstract

This research aims to determine: 1) the effect of teacher-student interpersonal relationship on learning motivation, 2) the effect of school environment on learning motivation and 3) the effect of teacher-student interpersonal relationship and school environment on student learning motivation at SMK Negeri 1 Banyudono. This research is quantitative research with a correlational method. The subject of this research is students of SMK Negeri 1 Banyudono. The sampling technique used on this research is stratified random sampling. Data collection technique using a questionnaire. The instrument validation technique used on this research is validity test and reliability test. Data analysis includes classical assumption tests, such as normality tests, linearity tests and multicollinearity tests and there are hypothesis tests such as t-test, F-test, coefficient of determination, multiple regression analysis, effective contribution and relative contribution. The results of this research are: First, that there is a positive and significant influence of the teacher-student interpersonal relationship variable on student learning motivation at SMK Negeri 1 Banyudoni. This is evidenced by the value of T_value > T_table 6.67 > 1.98 and a significance value of <0.05. So H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. Second, it was found that there was no significant influence of school environmental variables on student learning motivation at SMK Negeri 1 Banyudono but the results still showed in a positive direction. This is proven by the significance value of the school environment of > 0.05 and the T _value of 0.56 < T _table of 1.98 so that H0 is accepted and H2 is rejected. Third, there is a positive and significant influence of teacher-student interpersonal relationship variables and the school environment together on student learning motivation at SMK Negeri 1 Banyudono. This is evidenced by the results of the F test with a F _value of 34.75 > 3.09 F _table with a significance level <0.05. So H0 is rejected and H3 is accepted. The results of multiple linear regression analysis show a coefficient of determination value of 0.438, where teacher-student interpersonal relationships and the school environment together influence student learning motivation by 43.8%. While the remaining 56.2% is influenced by other factors. Teachers should be active in participating in communication competency training in order to improve teacher-student interpersonal relationships and teachers pay more attention to all students.

References

Amborse, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M.C., & Norman, M.K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Fransisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.

Corpus, J. H., McClintic-Gilbert, M., & Hayenga, A. (2009). Within-year changes in children’s intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Contextual predictors and academic outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 154–166.

Covington, M. (1998). The will to learn: A guide for motivating young people. New York: Cambridge University Press

Djamarah, S. & Zain, A. (2010). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2010). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Downie, Michelle, Genevieve A. Mageau, dan Richard Koestner. (2008). “What makes for a pleasant social interaction? Motivational dynamics of interpersonal relations”. http: //search. proquest. com/index. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 148(2).

Epensius, Genjik, B., & Khosmas. (2020). Pengaruh lingkungan sekolah terhadap motivasi belajar ekonomi kelas X SMA Santa Maria Nanga Pinoh. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa. 9 (8). Diperoleh 11 November 2022, dari https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/42018/75676586711.

Hamalik, Oemar. (2017). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Martin, A. & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues and practice. Review for Educational Research, 79, 327-365.

Martin, A. (2013). The Personal Proficiency Network. Key self-system factors and processes to optimize academic development. In D. M. McInerncy, H. W. Marsh., R. G. Craven, & F. Guay (Eds.), Theory driving research: New wave perspectives on self-processes and human development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Nasrullah, M., Ilmawati, I., Saleh, S., Niswaty, R., & Salam, R. (2018). Minat dan motivasi menjadi guru pada mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan administrasi perkantoran fakultas ilmu sosial Universitas Negeri Makassar. Ad`ministrare. 5(2).

Nasution, T. A. (2019). Pengaruh intelegensi pada motivasi belajar akademik siswa MAS YPI Batang Kuis. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. 3(2).

Opdenakker, M.-C., Maulana, R., & den Brok, P. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal relationships and academic motivation within one school year: Developmental changes and linkage. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 95–119.

Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4): 667. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.

Reeve, J. et. al. (2009). Self determination theory: A dialectical framework for understanding sociocultural influences on student motivation. In D. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.). Big theories revisitted. Greenwich, CT : Information Age Publishing.

Slameto. (2015). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to learn: integrating theory and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Standage, M., Duda, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411–433.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009). Landasan psikologi proses pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Suparlan. (2006). Guru sebagai profesi. Yogyakarta: Hikayat Pusblishing.

Whitaker, Todd. (2004). What great principals do differently. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education, Inc.

Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2016). Expectancy-value theory, in handbook of motivation in school, 2nd Edn. eds K. R. Wentzel and D. B. Mielecpesnm (New York, NY: Routledge), 55–74.